距离2015年6月英语四六级考试还有几天时间了，文都 四六级考试网小编整理了一些英语 四六级冲刺试卷供大家练习，希望有助于大家复习。

　　一、选词填空题

　　第1题：

　　Education is a long process that not only provides us with basic skills such as literacy and numeracy, but is also essential in shaping our future lives. From the moment we enter 1 as small children, and as we progress through primary and secondary education, we are laying the foundation for the life ahead of us. We must2 ourselves to work hard so that we can pass exams and gain the qualifications we will need to3 a good job. We must also acquire 4 life skills so that we can fit in and work with those around us. And of course health education helps us to understand how we can stay 5 and healthy.

　　For most people, this process ends when they are in their mid-to-late teens. For others, however, it is the beginning of a(n)6 of learning. After they finish school, many progress to 7 education where they will learn more useful skills such as computer literacy or basic business management. Others will enroll in a program of 8 education at a university where, with hard work, they will have the opportunity to graduate after three or four years with a well-earned degree. After that, they may work for a while before 9 to study for a higher degree—an M.A., for example, or a PhD. And if they live a long way from a college or university, they might follow a correspondence course using mail and the Internet. In fact, it is 10 due to the proliferation of computers that many people, who have not been near a school for many years, have started to study again and can proudly class themselves as mature students.

　　[A] changing

　　[B] secure

　　[C] longer

　　[D] kindergarten

　　[E] higher

　　[F] lifetime

　　[G] deepen

　　[H] largely

　　[I] discipline

　　[J] fit

　　[K] opting

　　[L] school

　　[M] valuable

　　[N] heavily

　　[O] further

　　【参考答案】：

　　DIBMJFOEKH

　　二、阅读理解

　　第2题：

　　The Food and Drug Administration said on Wednesday that it is trying to track down as many as 386 piglets that may have been genetically engineered and wrongfully sold into the U.S. food supply.

　　The focus of the FDA investigation is on pigs raised by researchers at the University of Illinois in Urbana Champaign. They engineered the animals with two genes: one is a cow gene that increases milk production in the sow; the other, a synthetic gene, makes the milk easier for piglets to digest. The goal was to raise bigger pigs faster.

　　There has been no evidence that either genetically altered plants or animals actually trigger human illness, but critics warn that potential side effects remain unknown. University officials say their tests showed the piglets were not born with the altered genes, but FDA rules require even the offspring of genetically engineered animals to be destroyed so they won't get into the food supply.

　　The FDA, in a quickly arranged news conference on Wednesday prompted by inquiries by USA TODAY, said the University of Illinois would face possible sanctions and fines for selling the piglets to a livestock broker, who in turn sold them to processing plants.

　　Both the FDA and the university say the pigs that entered the market do not pose a risk to consumers. But the investigation follows action by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in December to fine a Texas company that contaminated 500,000 bushels of soybeans with corn that had been genetically altered to produce a vaccine for pigs.

　　Critics see such cases as evidence of the need for more government oversight of a burgeoning(新兴的)area of scientific research. "This is a small incident, but it's incidents like this that could destroy consumer confidence and export confidence," says Stephanie Childs of the Grocery Manufacturers of America. "We already have Europe shaky on biotech. The countries to which we export are going to look at this."

　　The University of Illinois says it tested the DNA of every piglet eight times to make sure that the animal hadn't inherited the genetic engineering of its mother. Those piglets that did were put back into the study. Those that didn't were sold to the pig broker. "Any pig that was tested negative for the genes since 1999 has been sent off to market," says Charles Zukoski, vice chancellor for research.

　　But FDA deputy commissioner Lester Crawford says that under the terms of the university's agreement with the FDA, the researchers were forbidden to remove the piglets without FDA approval. "The University of Illinois failed to check with FDA to see whether or not the animals could be sold on the open market. And they were not to be used under any circumstance for food."

　　The FDA is responsible for regulating and overseeing transgenic animals because such genetic manipulation is considered an unapproved animal drug.

　　1. The 386 piglets wrongfully sold into food supply are from ________.

　　[A] Europe [B] an American research organization

　　[C] a meat processing plant [D] an animal farm

　　2. The purpose of the transgenic engineering research is to ________.

　　[A] get pigs of larger size in a shorter time

　　[B] make sows produce more milk

　　[C] make cows produce more milk

　　[D] make pigs grow more lean meat

　　3. The 4th paragraph shows that the University of Illinois ________.

　　[A] was criticized by the FDA

　　[B] is in great trouble

　　[C] is required by the FDA to call back the sold piglets

　　[D] may have to pay the penalty

　　4. The FDA declares that the wrongfully sold piglets ________.

　　[A] may have side effects on consumers [B] may be harmful to consumers

　　[C] are safe to consumers [D] may cause human illness

　　5. It can be inferred from this passage that ________.

　　[A] all the offspring have their mothers' genetic engineering

　　[B] part of the offspring have their mothers' genetic engineering

　　[C] none of the offspring have their mothers' genetic engineering

　　[D] half of the offspring have their mothers' genetic engineering

　　1小题>、【正确答案】：B

　　2小题>、【正确答案】：A

　　3小题>、【正确答案】：D

　　4小题>、【正确答案】：C

　　5小题>、【正确答案】：B

　　【参考解析】：

　　1.B 推断题。段指出FDA想要找到被不正当地卖入美国食品市场的仔猪;第二段句又指出，FDA调查的焦点是位于Urbana Champaign的伊利诺伊大学的科研人员饲养的猪，由此可知，B正确。虽然文章提到了processing plants，但干扰项C用的是单数，那么多仔猪不可能只卖给一家加工厂，故排除。

　　2.A 细节题。文章第二段最后一句指出，该试验的最终目的是更快地培育出更大的猪，由此可知，A正确。

　　3.D 推断题。文章第四段提到，FDA在一个新闻发布会上宣称，伊利诺伊大学因其售猪行为将面临制裁(sanctions)和罚款(fines)。D项“将可能被迫交纳一笔罚金”与之相符，所以D正确。

　　4.C 细节题。通观全文，似乎都是对动物转基因实验不利的内容，但细读文章可知，FDA的举措只是为了防范未知的可能危害。第五段首句更明确指出，FDA和伊利诺伊大学均声称进入市场的仔猪不会对消费者构成危胁，所以C正确。

　　5.B 推断题。第七段提到，伊利诺伊大学称，每头仔猪都做了八次检验以确保它们没有转基因遗传，若检出带有转基因遗传的则被送回用于研究，南此可推断B正确，即部分仔猪携带母猪的遗传基因。

　　第3题：

　　A class action lawsuit has been filed against a prominent Toronto doctor by patients who allege he injected a banned substance into their faces for cosmetic purposes. The doctor had already been investigated for more than three years for using the liquid silicone, a product not authorized for use in Canada.

　　Some patients say they are now suffering health problems and think the liquid silicone may be to blame. One of those patients is Anna Barbiero. She says her Toronto dermatologist told her he was using liquid silicone to smooth out wrinkles. what she says he didn't tell her is that it isn't approved for use in Canada. "I didn't know what liquid silicone was and he just called it 'liquid gold'," Barbiero remembers. After her last treatment, Anna discovered Dr. Sheldon Pollack had been ordered to stop using the silicone two years earlier by Health Canada. Experts say silicone can migrate through the body, and cause inflammation and deformities.

　　"My upper lip is always numb and it burns," Barbiero says. Barbiero is spearheading(带头)a lawsuit against the doctor, who her lawyer thinks might involve up to 100 patients injected with the same material. "The fact, a physician of his stature would use an unauthorized product on a patient because he thought it was okay, is really very disturbing," says lawyer Douglas Elliott.

　　Ontario's College of Physicians and Surgeons is also investigating Dr. Pollack to see if, in fact, he continued to use the silicone after agreeing to stop and whether he wrote in patient records that he used another legal product when he used silicone. However, in a letter to the College, Dr. Pollack wrote that he had always told patients that the silicone was not approved for sale in Canada, and had warned them of the risks. And in Barbiero's case, "...at the time of her first visit, prior to her ever receiving IGLS treatment, I specifically informed her that the material was not approved for sale in Canada by the Health Protection Branch and that I did receive the material from outside the country ...I would like to emphasize that, as is evident on Ms. Barbiero's chart, I drew a specific diagram on the chart which I carefully discussed with and explained to Ms. Barbiero as I did with every other patient to explain the nature and likelihood of complications and the reasons and consequences of those possible complications."

　　Dr. Pollack declined to speak to CTV News, or to have his lawyer discuss the case. None of the allegations have been proven in court. But the case raises questions about the ability of governing bodies to monitor doctors. "There's a larger message and that is: buyer beware," says Nancy Neilsen of Cosmetic Surgery Canada, "It's incumbent(负有义务的)on consumers to do their research."

　　1. Doctor Sheldon Pollack was charged that ________.

　　[A] he had prescribed wrong medicine for patients by mistake

　　[B] he had treated his patients with something illegal, causing bad result

　　[C] he had pretended to be a prominent surgeon

　　[D] he had sold an unauthorized product in large amount

　　2. What does the word "dermatologist" (Line 2, Para. 2) mean?

　　[A] A person whose work is filling, cleaning and taking out teeth.

　　[B] A person whose work is studying mental diseases.

　　[C] A person whose work is healing eye diseases.

　　[D] A person whose work is curing skin diseases.

　　3. The investigation of Ontario's College of Physicians and Surgeons is to find ________.

　　[A] whether he still has illegal treatment on his patients

　　[B] how many patients have been abused

　　[C] if he told his patients about the risk

　　[D] how much money he got from his illegal treatment

　　4. Which of the following is TRUE according to the passage?

　　[A] Barbiero took the treatment after being told the risk.

　　[B] Dr. Sheldon Pollack started his work with the patients' agreement to accept the potential risk.

　　[C] A famous doctor should be authorized to use something he thinks okay on patients.

　　[D] Barbiero is suffering a lot.

　　5. From the ending part of the passage, we can conclude that________.

　　[A] Barbiero will win the lawsuit

　　[B] Dr. Sheldon Pollack will win the lawsuit

　　[C] the cases have been dismissed

　　[D] governing bodies to monitor doctor will be charged

　　1小题>、【正确答案】：B

　　2小题>、【正确答案】：D

　　3小题>、【正确答案】：A

　　4小题>、【正确答案】：D

　　5小题>、【正确答案】：C

　　【参考解析】：

　　1.B 细节题。文章段句指出，患者对一位多伦多的医生(Dr.Sheldon Pollack)提起了集体诉讼，指责他使用违禁材料做面部美容，故选B。

　　2.D 语义题。由文章第二段第三句中的wrinkles(皱纹)可知，Barbiero的dermatologist使用液体硅胶抚平皱纹，由此推断，dermatologist应为“皮肤科医生”，故选D。

　　3.A 细节题。文章第四段句指出，安大略医学院正在调查Dr.Pollack，以便弄清他在同意停用液体硅胶后是否还在继续使用，以及他是否在使用硅胶的同时在患者的病历上写上另一种合法产品的名称，所以A正确。

　　4.D 推断题。文章第三段句指出，Barbiero说她的上唇麻木并有烧灼感，由此推断，她经受了很多痛苦，所以D正确。A、B项属于Dr.Pollack的辩解之词，具有争议性，应排除;C项是对Barbiero的律师Elliott提出存在的问题的曲解，也应排除。

　　5.C 推断题。由文章最后一段第二、三句可知，任何主张都没有被法庭采纳，同时这个案子还提出了相关机构对医生进行监管的问题，但并没有说这些机构将被起诉，所以选C。

　　三、阅读理解

　　第4题：

　　Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1. For questions 1-4, mark

　　Y (for YES if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage;

　　N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage;

　　NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage.

　　For questions 5-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.

　　Suggestions for Your Work

　　Annie is a longtime secretary/receptionist for two senior vice presidents at a big company. They have been doing a lot of hiring lately, and almost all of the new middle-management personnel have been interviewed by one or the other of Annie's two bosses, so naturally they come through her office first.

　　Some of these people are unbelievably rude. Either they treat Annie like a piece of furniture (no hello, no eye contact) or they think she is their errand(差使)girl. Lately, Annie's two bosses have started asking her for her impressions of job candidates. So far this week, two have been discourteous(失礼的)and dismissive, so Annie gave both the thumbs-down. Neither is getting called back for the next round of interviews.

　　No one knows how common this is, but if you are job hunting, it's necessary to be aware that the dummy at the reception desk may be anything but not "just a secretary".

　　Suggestions to Job Hunters

　　According to Annie Stevens and Greg Gostanian, two partners at a Boston-based executive coaching firm called Clear Rock, it's not unusual these days for a hiring manager to ask everyone who meets a potential new hire to give an opinion of him or her. "One of the biggest reasons so many newly recruited managers fail in a new job is their inability to fit in and get along with the people who are already there," says Stevens. "So employers now want to get staffers' impressions right at the start."

　　Adds Gostanian:" A lot can be learned from how candidates treat receptionists. If the jobseeker is rude, condescending, or arrogant, this might be an indication of how he or she would treat coworkers or direct reports."

　　Obviously, anyone looking for a new job would do well not to alienate the person who sits outside the interviewer's door. Stevens and Gostanian offer these six tips for getting off to the right start:

　　•Introduce yourself as you would to any other potential new colleague. Smile, shake hands, and so on. It seems odd that this has to be spelled out, but apparently it does; and, besides being a matter of common courtesy, ordinary friendliness offers a practical advantage. "Learning and remembering an interviewer's receptionist's name can only help as you advance in the interviewing process," Stevens notes.

　　•Don't regard a receptionist or other assistant as an underling(部下)—at least, not as your own personal underling. "Always ask the interviewer if you need help from anyone else in the office where you're interviewing, instead of seeking this directly yourself," says Gostanian. In other words, if you'd like to leave an extra copy of your resume, refrain from sending the interviewer's assistant to the Xerox machine.

　　•It's fine to accept if you're offered a beverage, but keep it simple. "Don't ask for particular brand names or expect to be brewed a fresh pot of coffee," Stevens says. And of course, need we add that dispatching anybody to Starbucks is out of the question?

　　•Feel free to make small talk, but know that anything you say may well get back to the interviewer. "Don't ask probing questions about the company or offer unsolicited opinions," Gostanian advises. No matter how hideous the office door, endless the hike from the parking lot, or inconvenient the wait to see the interviewer, keep it to yourself. Plenty of time for whining(抱怨)and grumbling after you're hired.

　　•Don't talk on your cell phone in front of the receptionist, and try to put your BlackBerry aside. "If you have to make or take a call, leave the reception area," Stevens says. Preoccupation with wireless devices will mark you, she says, as "a cold and fixated person".

　　•Don't forget to say good-bye. "Failure to say good-bye to someone you've just met reflects negatively on you," Gostanian notes. "You'll come across as impersonal and uncaring." That's hardly the image any job hunter wants to project.

　　How to Measure Your Work

　　Any job, like any relationship, has its difficult moments. And with the job market heating up, the temptations to change partners are growing.

　　As with any relationship, however, you really should assess the full value of what you've got before giving it up wholesale, because—let's fact it—regret really is a waste of your time.

　　Regardless of the main task of a job—be it bond trading, teaching, balancing the books, or cleaning hotel rooms—are there objective criteria that you can use to measure whether your job is wonderful or not?

　　Workplace experts Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman have identified several. In their book First, Break All the Rules: What the World's Greatest Managers Do Differently, they offer a useful guide in the form of 12 questions:

　　•Do I know what's expected of me at work?

　　•Do I have the materials and equipment I need to do my work right?

　　•At work, do I have the opportunity to do what I do best every day?

　　•In the last 7 days, have I received recognition or praise for doing good work?

　　•Does my supervisor, or someone at work, seem to care about me as a person?

　　•Is there someone at work who encourages my development?

　　•At work, do my opinions seem to count?

　　•Does the mission/purpose of my company make me feel my job is important?

　　•Are my coworkers committed to doing quality work?

　　•Do I have a best friend at work?

　　•In the last six months, has someone at work talked to me about my progress?

　　•This last year, have I had opportunities at work to learn and to grow?

　　Buckingham and Coffman picked these 12 questions after looking for patterns among the responses of more than 1 million employees to workplace questions posed by the Gallup Organization over the years.

　　"We were searching for those special questions where the most engaged employees ... answered positively, and everyone else...answered neutrally or negatively," they wrote.

　　Their reasoning: they wanted to identify the key elements of a strong workplace that can attract and retain talent.

　　Satisfaction with pay and benefits didn't make the list not because they're not important, Coffman said, but because they're important to all employees, whether they're engaged in their work or not.

　　So, assuming you feel you're paid the going rate for your job, answering affirmatively to all or even most of the 12 questions can be an indication that you've got a great job that you should part with only for very good reason. And if job satisfaction is important to you, then the promise of a bigger paycheck alone may not be reason enough.

　　When Coffman is asked what percentage of companies he thinks actually pass the 12-question test, his estimate is no more than 15 percent. But within a company, he said, individual departments may meet the test, even if the company overall doesn't.

　　Why? The manager of a department makes all the difference. Coffman said when an employee quits, 70 percent of the time she's not leaving because of the job, she's leaving because of the manager.

　　One cautionary note: your job may not be as wonderful for you as you think if you answer a majority of the 12 questions affirmatively but the few questions that you can't are among the first six. That's because the first six questions make up the base on which job satisfaction rests, according to Buckingham and Coffman. If your current job doesn't meet the first six criteria, you are more likely to be disengaged with your work and less productive than you could be.

　　Consider question three after all. Do you have the opportunity to do what you do best everyday? "If you're not able to use your gifts every day, you'll be pretty frustrated," Coffman said.

　　Of course, job satisfaction isn't a one-way street with a department either meeting your needs or not. In order to answer the 12 questions honestly, you need to know what it is that makes you tick and not blindly blame your department for any job dissatisfaction.

　　Do you know what it is you like to do and what you do best? What kind of recognition do you like? Public or private? What are your values and do they square with your company's goals? How do you like a manager to relate to you?

　　Otherwise, your career, like a string of bad relationships, can become a case of "different partner, same problems".

　　1. When you go to a company for an interview, there is no need to care the feelings of the receptionists.

　　2. According to Annie Stevens, many newly recruited managers fail in a new job because they cannot get along with their coworkers.

　　3. If you want to get off to the right start, you should treat the receptionists as your potential bosses.

　　4. If you fail to say "thank you" to the receptionists, they will have negative impressions of you.

　　5. If you want to give up a job wholesale, you should evaluate ________ from it.

　　6. When you are measuring your work, you should consider that if there is someone at work who encourages your development and talks to you about __________.

　　7. The question about satisfaction with pay and benefits is not included in the 12 questions because it's important to all employees, whether ________ or not.

　　8. Even if the company overall cannot pass the 12-question test, ________ may pass it.

　　9. You should pay special attention to the first six questions of the 12 questions because they make up the base on which ________.

　　10. If you want to answer the 12 questions honestly, you should know what makes you not blindly blame your department for ________.

　　1小题>【参考答案】：

　　N

　　2小题>【参考答案】：

　　Y

　　3小题>【参考答案】：

　　N

　　4小题>【参考答案】：

　　NG

　　5小题>【参考答案】：

　　what/all you’ve got

　　6小题>【参考答案】：

　　.your progress

　　7小题>【参考答案】：

　　they’re engaged in their work

　　8小题>【参考答案】：

　　individual departments within the company

　　9小题>【参考答案】：

　　job satisfaction rests

　　10小题>【参考答案】：

　　any job dissatisfaction

　　四、翻译

　　第5题：

　　A report said ________________________(这里只剩下不过30只野生野生老虎).

　　【参考答案】：

　　there were no more than 30 wild tigers left here

　　第6题：

　　In modern times, several people ________________________(在那瀑布上走过，他们大多数是有意的).

　　【参考答案】：

　　have gone over that fall，most of them on purpose

　　第7题：

　　Had I seen the film, ________________________(我昨晚就和你讨论该问题了).

　　【参考答案】：

　　I would have discussed the problem with you last night

　　第8题：

　　There, in the mud, were footprints—footprints ________________________(几乎是正常人脚的十倍大).

　　【参考答案】：

　　that were almost ten times larger than a normal human foot

　　第9题：

　　All of us have read thrilling stories ________________________(故事中的主人公只能活一段很有限的时光).

　　【参考答案】：

　　in which the hero had only a limited time to live

　　五、写作题

　　第10题：

　　Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition on the topic: A way from Net-bar Campaign. You should write at least 150 words following the outline given below:

　　1. 新闻媒体披露，徐州某中学1000多名学生签名;庄严承诺“远离网吧”

　　2. 分析“远离网吧”运动的原因

　　3. 做出对比和评论

　　Away from Net-bar Campaign

　　【参考答案】：

　　Away from Net-bar Campaign

　　It has been reported that a middle school in Xuzhou City has recently launched a campaign named "Away from Net-bar". More than a thousand students have signed for their solemn promise that they will not spend a single minute in the net-bars. With the coming of the summer vacation, this campaign is especially meaningful for the healthy development of the minors.

　　The Internet has brought people great convenience in getting information, entertaining and contacting each other, and it has also benefited some businessmen, especially the owners of net-bars. While it is true that most net-bars are running legally, it is also true that some are offering unhealthy programs that involve violence and sex content. Since most middle school students are prone to be influenced and they can hardly tell which bar is doing well and which one is not, it is only advisable that they should stay away from all.

　　Besides, staying away from net-bars is also good to students' physical health. By passively sitting too long in front of the computer screen, both their eyesight and physique suffer.

　　Obviously, the Away from Net-bars Campaign is an activity that is worth advocating and it merits other schools' reference.

编辑推荐：

     2015年6月英语四六级真题答案解析专题

　　 2015年6月英语四六级冲刺指导专题

　　 2015年6月英语六级听力预热练习汇总

　　 2015年6月英语六级复习备考指导汇总

　　 2015年6月英语六级写作预热练习汇总

    文都四六级交流群：419042764

查看更多《六级模拟题》内容>>>