小编提醒各位考生,做英语阅读理解要注意的是,阅读理解所有的答题依据都来源于文章,来源于作者观点态度!不能因为自己认为某个原因说得过去、某个做法是合理的就偏离文章原意作答,这样可能就陷入了出题人为我们挖的陷阱。为了帮助考生们顺利通 过英语六级考试,下面是文都四六级网站为大家分享的2019年12月英语六级阅读真题预测7,希望对您有所帮助。

12月英语六级阅读真题预测7

Apple's Stance Highlights a MoreConfrontational Tech Industry

[A] The battle between Apple and law enforcementofficials over unlocking a terrorist's smartphone isthe culmination of a slow turning of the tablesbetween the technology industry and the UnitedStates government.

[B] After revelations by the former National SecurityAgency contractor Edward J. Snowden in 2013 that the government both cozied up to (讨好) certain tech companies and hacked into others to gain access to private data on an enormousscale, tech giants began to recognize the United States government as a hostile actor. But ifthe confrontation has crystallized in this latest battle, it may already be heading toward apredictable conclusion: In the long run, the tech companies are destined to emergevictorious.

[C] It may not seem that way at the moment. On the one side, you have the United Statesgovernment's mighty legal and security apparatus fighting for data of the mostsympathetic sort: the secrets buried in a dead mass murderer's phone. The action steins froma federal court order issued on Tuesday requiring Apple to help the Federal Bureau ofInvestigation (FBI) to unlock an iPhone used by one of the two attackers who killed 14 people inSan Bernardino, California, in December.

[D] In the other corner is the world's most valuable company, whose chief executive, Timothy Cook, has said he will appeal the court's order. Apple argues that it is fighting topreserve a principle that most of us who are addicted to our smartphones can defend: Weaken a single iPhone so that its contents can be viewed by the American government andyou risk weakening all iPhones for any government intruder, anywhere.

[E] There will probably be months of legal confrontation, and it is not at all clear which sidewill prevail in court, nor in the battle for public opinion and legislative favor. Yet underlyingall of this is a simple dynamic: Apple, Google, Facebook and other companies hold most of thecards in this confrontation. They have our data, and their businesses depend on the globalpublic's collective belief that they will do everything they can to protect that data.

[F] Any crack in that front could be fatal for tech companies that must operate worldwide. IfApple is forced to open up an iPhone for an American law enforcement investigation, what is toprevent it from doing so for a request from the Russians or the Iranians? If Apple is forced towrite code that lets the FBI get into the Phone 5c used by Syed Rizwan Farook, the maleattacker in the San Bernardino attack, who would be responsible if some hacker got hold of thatcode and broke into its other devices?

[G] Apple's stance on these issues emerged post-Snowden, when the company started puttingin place a series of technologies that, by default, make use of encryption (加密)to limit accessto people's data. More than that, Apple—and, in different ways, other tech companies, includingGoogle, Facebook, Twitter and Microsoft—have made their opposition to the government'sclaims a point of corporate pride.

[H] Apple's emerging global brand is privacy; it has staked its corporate reputation, notto mention the investment of considerable technical and financial resources, on limiting thesort of mass surveillance that was uncovered by Mr. Snowden. So now, for many casesinvolving governmental intrusions into data, once-lonely privacy advocates find themselvesfighting alongside the most powerful company in the world.

[I] "A comparison point is in the 1990s battles over encryption," said Kurt Opsahl, generalcounsel of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy watchdog group. "Then you had a fewcompanies involved, but not one of the largest companies in the world coming out with alengthy and impassioned post, like we saw yesterday from Timothy Cook. Its profile hasreally been raised."

[J] Apple and oilier tech companies hold another ace: the technical means to keep makingtheir devices more and more inaccessible. Note that Apple's public opposition to thegovernment's request is itself a hindrance to mass government intrusion. And to get at thecontents of a single iPhone, the government says it needs a court order and Apple's help towrite new code; in earlier versions of the iPhone, ones that were created before Apple foundreligion on (热衷于) privacy, the FBI might have been able to break into the device by itself.

[K] You can expect that noose (束缚) to continue to tighten. Experts said that whether or notApple loses this specific case, measures that it could put into place in the future will almostcertainly be able to further limit the government's reach.

[L] That is not to say that the outcome of the San Bernardino case is insignificant. As appleand several security experts have argued, an order compelling Apple to write software thatgives the FBI access to the iPhone in question would establish an unsettling precedent. Theorder essentially asks Apple to hack its own devices, and once it is in place, the precedentcould be used to justify law enforcement efforts to get around encryption technologies in otherinvestigations far removed from national security threats.

[M] Once aimed with a method for gaining access to iPhones, the government could ask to useit proactively (先发制人地), before a suspected terrorist attack—leaving Apple in a bind as towhether to comply or risk an attack and suffer a public-relations nightmare. "This is a brandnew move in the war against encryption," Mr. Opsahl said. "We have had plenty of debates inCongress and the media over whether the government should have a backdoor, and this is anend run (迂回战术) around that—here they come with an order to create that backdoor."

[N] Yet it is worth noting that even if Apple ultimately loses this case, it has plenty oftechnical means to close a backdoor over time. "If they are anywhere near worth their salt asengineers, I bet they are rethinking their threat model as we speak," said Jonathan Zdziarski, a digital expert who studies the iPhone and its vulnerabilities.

[O] One relatively simple fix, Mr. Zdziarski said, would be for Apple to modify future versionsof the iPhone to require a user to enter a passcode before the phone will accept the sort ofmodified operating system that the FBI wants Apple to create. That way, Apple could notunilaterally introduce a code that weakens the iPhone—a user would have to consent to it.

[P] "Nothing is 100 percent hacker-proof," Mr. Zdziarski said, but he pointed out that thejudge's order in this case required Apple to provide "reasonable security assistance" tounlock Mr. Farook's phone. If Apple alters the security model of future iPhones so that even itsown engineers' "reasonable assistance" will not be able to crack a given device whencompelled by the government, a precedent set in this case might lose its lasting force. Inother words, even if the FBI wins this case, in the long run, it loses.

36. It is a popular belief that tech companies are committed to protecting their customers'private data.

37. The US government believes that its access to people's iPhones could be used to preventterrorist attacks.

38. A federal court asked Apple to help the FBI access data in a terrorist's iPhone.

39. Privacy advocates now have Apple fighting alongside them against government access topersonal data.

40. Snowden revealed that the American government had tried hard to access private data on amassive scale.

41. The FBI might have been able to access private data in earlier iPhones without Apple's help.

42. After the Snowden incident, Apple made clear its position to counter governmentintrusion into personal data by means of encryption.

43. According to one digital expert, no iPhone can be entirely free from hacking.

44. Timothy Cook's long web post has helped enhance Apple's image.

45. Apple's CEO has decided to appeal the federal court's order to unlock a user's iPhone.

英语六级阅读参考答案:

36.E

37.M

38.C

39.H

40.B

41.J

42.G

43.P

44.I

45.D

以上就是文都四六级整理的2019年12月英语六级阅读真题预测,希望对您有所帮助。更多历年四级真题及答案历年六级真题及答案请关注文都四六级网站。

点击查看:

【文都版】2019年12月大学英语六级真题答案及解析汇总

【责任编辑:】